I’m an avid photographer. I take my camera almost everywhere, hoping to get that shot. You know, the one that captures something truly amazing that rockets me into photography stardom.
I’ve always been into photojournalism. I love the way a photograph can tell a story without a single word uttered. I like the fact that photographs are static, they are frozen in time, preserving a memory or a moment that someone else might miss.
Photography is a fine art. It takes skill to capture something in such a way that it is powerful enough to stand on its own. That’s why, I was deeply saddened when Fairfax Media decided to cull many of their senior photographers in 2014.
At first I couldn’t understand it. Why would they sacrifice a job that is so important? There’s a photograph complementing most stories in a newspaper or an article online.
However, as I thought about it more, I realised that there was something better than a photographer. A free photographer. Twitter has revolutionised the way we receive news. It encourages 24/7 updates and has also birthed the citizen journalist. Why would a newspaper pay for photographers, when they could leverage the media people were sharing online everyday for free?
Of course, the quality isn’t the same, the subject may not be composed a well, but if it’s free, is it better?
In a world where the future of printed bulletins is uncertain, news corporations are looking to cut costs anywhere they can, but is photography the best place to cut corners? Fairfax seems to think so.